OBJECTIVE: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), a disease of unknown
etiology, is characterized by a variable elevation of luteinizing hormone. We
previously showed presence and activity of autoantibodies (AAbs) to the second
extracellular loop (ECL2) of other G-protein receptors (similar to
GnRH). Our objective was to compare the presence and activity of AAbs
directed to the ECL2 of the GnRH receptor (GnRHR) in PCOS patients
compared to ovulatory controls.
DESIGN: Case-cohort study
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Infertile PCOS subjects based on Rotterdam
criteria and infertile ovulatory controls seen at an academic
fertility clinic 2012-2016 were included in the study if they had stored
serum prior to beginning treatment... More
OBJECTIVE: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), a disease of unknown
etiology, is characterized by a variable elevation of luteinizing hormone. We
previously showed presence and activity of autoantibodies (AAbs) to the second
extracellular loop (ECL2) of other G-protein receptors (similar to
GnRH). Our objective was to compare the presence and activity of AAbs
directed to the ECL2 of the GnRH receptor (GnRHR) in PCOS patients
compared to ovulatory controls.
DESIGN: Case-cohort study
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Infertile PCOS subjects based on Rotterdam
criteria and infertile ovulatory controls seen at an academic
fertility clinic 2012-2016 were included in the study if they had stored
serum prior to beginning treatment. Serum was screened by ELISA for
AAbs to GnRHR using a synthetic 28-mer peptide (GenScript, Piscataway,
NJ) from the ECL2 of human GnRHR as coating antigen. Optical
density (OD) values were read at 405 nm at 60 minutes. Activity of
GnRHR AAb in IgG purified from sera of 4 subjects with PCOS and 4
controls was analyzed with a GnRHR-transfected Chem-1 cell-based calcium
flux assay (Eurofins, St Charles, MO). AAb specific effect was
tested by GnRHR blockade. Group data are presented as mean SD or
percent. Groups were compared using Student t or Pearson chi-squared
tests. OD values were converted to z-scores for analysis, and are reported
as such. An ROC curve was used to assess OD as a diagnostic test for
PCOS.
RESULTS: 79 PCOS patients and 73 controls were included. There were
no significant (p>0.05) differences between the groups in age (overall
29 3), race (74% white) or BMI (29 8). Standardized OD in PCOS patients
(0.53 1.00) was significantly higher (p<0.001) than in ovulatory
controls (-0.55 0.62). Using OD to determine a ROC curve for PCOS
the Area Under the Curve was 0.83 ( 0.03;p<0.001). As a predictor of
PCOS, OD alone had 74% sensitivity and 84% specificity for PCOS. There
was a significant calcium flux response to IgG isolated from PCOS patients
compared to controls (67.1 6.4 vs 30.9 1.5, % of maximum response,
p<0.01). This PCOS (but not control) IgG-induced GnRHR activation
was effectively suppressed by specific GnRHR blockade with cetrorelix
(p<0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: We developed a sensitive and specific biomarker for
PCOS, activating AAb to the ECL2 of the GnRHR. At the hypothalamic/pituitary
level, AAbs will likely be contributive and possibly causative
of the menstrual dysfunction and metabolic disturbances
demonstrated in PCOS subjects, and may represent the long-desired
identifying diagnostic test for PCOS. We plan to evaluate the association
between these AAbs and the PCOS-associated metabolic abnormalities
in humans, in animal models and in pregnancy outcomes with
ovulation induction.