DNA binding domains (DBDs) have been used with great success to impart targeting capabilities to a variety of proteins creating highly useful genomic tools. We evaluated the ability of five types of DBDs and strategies (AAV Rep proteins， Cre， TAL effectors， zinc finger proteins， and Cas9/gRNA system) to target the L1 ORF2 protein to drive retrotransposition of Alu inserts to specific sequences in the human genome. First， we find that the L1 ORF2 protein tolerates the addition of protein domains both at the amino- and carboxy-terminus. Although in some instances retrotransposition efficiencies slightly diminished， all fusion proteins containing an intact ORF2 were capable of driving retrotransposition. Second， the stability of individual ORF2 fusion proteins varies and difficult to predict. Third， DBDs that require the formation of multimers for target recognition are unlikely to modify targeting of ORF2p-driven insertions. Fourth， the more components needed to assemble into a complex to drive targeted retrotransposition， the less likely the strategy will increase targeted insertions. Fifth， abundance of target sequences present in the genome will likely dictate the effectiveness and efficiency of targeted insertions. Lastly， the cleavage capabilities of Cas9 (or a Cas9 nickase variant) are unable to substitute for the L1 ORF2 endonuclease domain functions， suggestive that the endonuclease domain has alternate functions needed for retrotransposition. From these studies， we conclude that the most critical component for the modification of the human L1 ORF2 protein to drive targeted insertions is the selection of the DBD due to the varying functional requirements and impacts on protein stability.